This follows on from a thread I started in the wanted section linky. The idea is that the front springs were stiffer and so would alter teh handling characteristics of the S2 and dia out a bit more understeer. H&R offer the option of 2 sets of front springs on the coupe to alter the rideheight / stance of the car so I though I'd look into doing it with standard parts to maintain some rideheight. Thanks to S2DriverUK and Jamo for some OE springs. Here's what I found:-
I've done a bit of measuring and have come up with the following numbers:-
Front
D = Outside Diameter = 139mm
d = Wire Diameter = 14.1mm
Rear
D = Outside Diameter = 145mm
d = Wire Diameter = 14.7mm
Now then, here's the science bit as I see it,
Assumptions:-
The OEM springs are not variable rate
The OEM springs are made from the same material
Both front and rear springs have equal numbers of coils (I've counted them and this is true).
The spring rate of a helical spring is proportional to d^4/D^3 using the assumptions above and that they have the same number of the coils. Using this formula, the rear springs have a spring constant approximately 4% stiffer than the fronts! However, the front is 50% heavier (60:40 weight distribution) and so there is 50% more preload on the spring (so it sags more). The increased preload on the front moves the operating region of the spring up the force vs. deflection curve and so the spring requires more force to achieve the same deflection as the rear under static loading conditions. Dynamically the mass means that the increased force is proportional to the increased mass and that's where my knowledge begins to fail me!
Therefore, it looks as though my idea of fitting front springs on the rear really shouldn't make much difference with standard springs!
I think I might just do it anyway as I'm going to rebuild the rear struts at some point ot fit top mounts and bump stops. I'll report on what I find then!
I've done a bit of measuring and have come up with the following numbers:-
Front
D = Outside Diameter = 139mm
d = Wire Diameter = 14.1mm
Rear
D = Outside Diameter = 145mm
d = Wire Diameter = 14.7mm
Now then, here's the science bit as I see it,
Assumptions:-
The OEM springs are not variable rate
The OEM springs are made from the same material
Both front and rear springs have equal numbers of coils (I've counted them and this is true).
The spring rate of a helical spring is proportional to d^4/D^3 using the assumptions above and that they have the same number of the coils. Using this formula, the rear springs have a spring constant approximately 4% stiffer than the fronts! However, the front is 50% heavier (60:40 weight distribution) and so there is 50% more preload on the spring (so it sags more). The increased preload on the front moves the operating region of the spring up the force vs. deflection curve and so the spring requires more force to achieve the same deflection as the rear under static loading conditions. Dynamically the mass means that the increased force is proportional to the increased mass and that's where my knowledge begins to fail me!
Therefore, it looks as though my idea of fitting front springs on the rear really shouldn't make much difference with standard springs!
I think I might just do it anyway as I'm going to rebuild the rear struts at some point ot fit top mounts and bump stops. I'll report on what I find then!
Comment