Would any one be interested in one of these?

[terrybullwon]

I had a response from him saying he accepted paypal but only outside of ebay

He must not like me or what i am trying to do?

[Jamo]

I had a response from him saying he accepted paypal but only outside of ebay

[terrybullwon]

I emailed the guy,

In german and he has not replyed

Maybe he's not interested, i will send another later tonight

Cheers James

[Jamo]

What's the deal with this?

Is it dead?

[denniselbows]

i think 034 do 2 versions one with hall sender bit one with out but not deff sure. they deffenatly do one with out.

[Billman]

The 034 item doesnt work with the hall sender doesnt it?

[Billman]

I think the only reason why anyone should think of a wider cambelt (therefore wider camgear, crankshaft gear and waterpump gear) is beacuse of sensibly higher loads over the valve tranny, which, as far as I can think of, is only due to higher then stock rpms and higher camshaft lifts. This will give two effects:
1) For higher revs you need stiffer springs (anyway with a higher elastic constant "K")which in turn gives higher loads.
2) The overall loads and drag absorbtions increase with the square of speed.

The two combined factors, depending of course on how much the increase in lift and rpm, can cause quite a significant load increase.
I don't think this should be an issue for not racing engines. I mean the 600++ hp monsters running 8500 rpms and mega lift camshafts (the latter only good when you want to squeeze out of the engine the very last few Hp at the higher rpms).

Marco

Good to have you here again mate, we ve missed your explanations

[Pisobiker]

Still don't get why you want the 31mm wide one over the 21mm one.

IIRC Mark Haliigan posted something similar about a wider gear?

I think the only reason why anyone should think of a wider cambelt (therefore wider camgear, crankshaft gear and waterpump gear) is beacuse of sensibly higher loads over the valve tranny, which, as far as I can think of, is only due to higher then stock rpms and higher camshaft lifts. This will give two effects:
1) For higher revs you need stiffer springs (anyway with a higher elastic constant "K")which in turn gives higher loads.
2) The overall loads and drag absorbtions increase with the square of speed.

The two combined factors, depending of course on how much the increase in lift and rpm, can cause quite a significant load increase.
I don't think this should be an issue for not racing engines. I mean the 600++ hp monsters running 8500 rpms and mega lift camshafts (the latter only good when you want to squeeze out of the engine the very last few Hp at the higher rpms).

Marco

[Jamo]

Thats 2 of us then Stu,
Maybe 3 when Jamo has stoped fafing about

Mofo!

Only interested in the 21mm one then mate. Get it sorted then

[Billman]

Me too if the price is right!

[AndyP]

Thats 2 of us then Stu,
Maybe 3 when Jamo has stoped fafing about

Count me in.

[denniselbows]

Can anybody confirm the 31mm fits the standard cambelt cover correctly?

i don't think it will i have a 034 adjustable pully on my 3b which is the wider one and it rubs on the cover so i would of thought it would be the same for this one.

[Corey]

Unless you widen the water pump pulley it is a waste of money having the wider version, you are stuck with a 19mm width belt because of the water pump.

Without letting the cat out of the bag there is work afoot to produce a wider pulley for the water pump that will allow the use of a 25mm belt (the cam pulley, idler roller and crank pulley are already available at this width) but I haven't said anything

[Jamo]

Can anybody confirm the 31mm fits the standard cambelt cover correctly?

[terrybullwon]

Still don't get why you want the 31mm wide one over the 21mm one.

IIRC Mark Haliigan posted something similar about a wider gear?

Maybe more surface area, less slip?