Just read an article on the EVO web site on the RS4 versus it's current rivals.
Whilst heavy praise was heaped on the RS4 the writer still claimed that on the limit stuff, the M3 was still the better car, even though it was slower.
Why do these a***oles always miss some of the more obvious areas where the RS4 completley trounces the M3:-
WHAT HAPPENS TO AN M3 IN THE WET - IT APPLIES IT'S BRAKES
Ther Audi is better built.
Faster.
Who want's to be seen in an M3
The Audi is much more exclusive.
It's not a BMW
It's just so much more
I rest my case.
Whilst heavy praise was heaped on the RS4 the writer still claimed that on the limit stuff, the M3 was still the better car, even though it was slower.
Why do these a***oles always miss some of the more obvious areas where the RS4 completley trounces the M3:-
WHAT HAPPENS TO AN M3 IN THE WET - IT APPLIES IT'S BRAKES
Ther Audi is better built.
Faster.
Who want's to be seen in an M3
The Audi is much more exclusive.
It's not a BMW
It's just so much more
I rest my case.
Comment