S2 £3k 89k miles but CAT D

[Duffelcoat]

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifie...-6spd/1659869#

Not sure if this is an actual S2 or if it is a 20v (quattro or no quattro)

Nothing to do with me BTW

[anthonys2]

Looks genuine and in pretty damn good nic from the pics worth a look if your after one mileage very low mileage don't think the bhp is accurate!!

[Mikes2]

169kw = 230hp

[Rusty]

It's a cat d, not c, so I've edited the title.

It'll be a cat c if you leave those tyres on tho. Budget tyres on a performance car always raises questions for me - what else has been scrimped on?

[re2500]

It'll be a cat c if you leave those tyres on tho. Budget tyres on a performance car always raises questions for me - what else has been scrimped on?

[Duffelcoat]

169kw = 230hp

True, was thinking that the 20v quattro non turbo is 170ps but that is something like 165bhp...

PS Thanks for title edit, erred on the side of caution!

[Dubbedup]

Looks like the drivers side rear 1/4 has had some BAD paintwork!

It looks really dull in comparison to the rest of the car..

[andy10v]

Looks like the drivers side rear 1/4 has had some BAD paintwork!

It looks really dull in comparison to the rest of the car..

Yup, my dad and I were discussing it, reckon it is almost as bad as my DIY attempt

Bonnet not quite right either.

[Cottis]

Agree with Rusty. Would never buy a car from anyone who boots up their car with such shocking rubber. The Pirellis on my Citroen double its value but at least it clings to the road (sort of) Why of why do people scrimp on tyres. Cheapskates who don't value their lives.

[Duffelcoat]

The Pirellis on my Citroen double its value

I agree, I bought two new fronts for my car, around £340, and my wife says that a lot for an old car...

But that is women's logic for you!

I tried to explain but gave up mid-sentence!

[raccabuda]

Rear offside bumper is all over the place. Not parallel to the back panel and doesn't line up with the wheel arch (and the paint is carp).

[anthonys2]

Think I may change my mind about this car Should of looked more closely!!!

[blondy]

Hi all I've rang up about this s2 the over week,the bloke said the only info that he has on the cat d is that it happened in 2000 and he thinks its the drivers side rear damage,which you defo can see that with the paint shade not just the same,made me laugh,he said I've drivin the car and it drives like new,what a nob lol,stay clear I say unless you buy the break for parts

[jubjub]

Yep.
And if you look at the rear bumper were it lines up with the curve of wheel arch it looks like it's an inch or so off.
Unless it's just fitted piss poor...

Looks like the drivers side rear 1/4 has had some BAD paintwork!

It looks really dull in comparison to the rest of the car..

[anthonys2]

Yeah but the car drives like new!!!!lol