For anybody who might be interested in, I put here some more numbers on these parts.
Take into account numbers are rounded to the closest half of mm so might not be precise enaugh for manufacturing purposes.
Here again comparison mesurements:
1) CONRODS:
1.1) center to center lenght: both 144 mm
1.2) total weight (with bearings):
- RS2 636 gr;
- AEL 692 gr;
1.3) big end weight (with bearings):
- RS2 470 gr;
- AEL 495 gr;
1.4) small end weight (with bearing):
- RS2 166 gr;
- AEL 197 gr;
(weights might have a small percentage of error due to not "professional" scale and small amounts of oil left over them)
1.5) RS2 pin hole diameter (with bearing) is 20 mm; AEL is 26 mm;
1.6) RS2 conrod has "end to end" oil hole through it. AEL has two oil holes on top of small end, feeding pin's bearing.
1.7) AEL conrod has significantly bigger center longitudinal (end to end) reinforcement;
1.8) RS2 conrod tapers from big to small end from 25mm of width to 20 mm, while AEL is 25mm all the way.
Take into account numbers are rounded to the closest half of mm so might not be precise enaugh for manufacturing purposes.
Here again comparison mesurements:
1) CONRODS:
1.1) center to center lenght: both 144 mm
1.2) total weight (with bearings):
- RS2 636 gr;
- AEL 692 gr;
1.3) big end weight (with bearings):
- RS2 470 gr;
- AEL 495 gr;
1.4) small end weight (with bearing):
- RS2 166 gr;
- AEL 197 gr;
(weights might have a small percentage of error due to not "professional" scale and small amounts of oil left over them)
1.5) RS2 pin hole diameter (with bearing) is 20 mm; AEL is 26 mm;
1.6) RS2 conrod has "end to end" oil hole through it. AEL has two oil holes on top of small end, feeding pin's bearing.
1.7) AEL conrod has significantly bigger center longitudinal (end to end) reinforcement;
1.8) RS2 conrod tapers from big to small end from 25mm of width to 20 mm, while AEL is 25mm all the way.
Comment