Originally posted by Doug_RS2
Cheers
How does wind resistance affect this Marco? If you do it from 0mph in 1st - it's going to give different results from doing it in 5th from 80mph up?
Cheers
How does wind resistance affect this Marco? If you do it from 0mph in 1st - it's going to give different results from doing it in 5th from 80mph up?
Let's make an example:
4th gear run:
1) you start from 0 mph in 1st beginning storage of data;
2) at 3000 rpm change in 2nd;
3) at 3000 change in 3th, than at 3000 change in 4th;
4) WOT till redline (this is the data you will use).
Sarting from 0 mph is the only way the device would know at what speed you are when starting to record useful data.
Now this run, compared to a rolling road 4th gear run, will show less power, due to the fact that on a r.r. you have 0 (zero) aerodynamical drag (which is sensible; it depends on wehicle cx but 50/60hp at 120 mph woud be a resonable value).
In my experience, even if a 4th gear run would be in the better performance range of engine, in open road 4th gear test is pretty hard to do. I didn't find around here a straight, leveled road long enaugh to allow starting from 0 mph, changing 3 gears, accelerating till redline in 4th (which means around 130 mph :eek2: ) and than braking early enaugh not to take of on following turn .
So, at the moment, all my mesurements are taken in 3th gear which, of course, will lead to a higher output detected (less speed=less aerodynamical+wheels+transmission drag).
In this case my ~280 hp at wheels in 3th gear ( at 35°C outside temp, 311 hp at 9°C) would probably mean 220 in 4th; then, adding some 40 hp for aerodynamical drag (3th gear run ends at about 100 mph) would probably go in the ~260 hp at wheels of a r.r.
Dividing then everything for the probable transmission + wheels efficiency of 0.75 shoud get some 350 hp at engine.
Marco
Comment