I'm far from convinced... http://www.lindseyracing.com/mm5/mer...egory_Code=HOW
Interesting, allbeit probably rubbish charge cooler
Collapse
X
-
Interesting, allbeit probably rubbish charge cooler
I'm far from convinced... http://www.lindseyracing.com/mm5/mer...egory_Code=HOW
'93 S4 Avant now back on the road complete with new shiny go faster bits.Tags: None -
There doesent look like enough turbulence in there to pull any heat from the charge.The ONLY S2 Golf!
http://www.s2forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19402
10.42@138mph
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0wnkkOfFpXg -
Looks like the sort of thing that might just work in a short term application (eg with an ice water tank for the drags), but a separate radiator is merely adding an extra heat exchanger into the equation, compared to a normal air-to-air intercooler.
The losses from two heat exchangers are very likely to be worse than the losses from one heat exchanger. I would call that a less efficient system.Martin Cutting
aka Keeper of "The Teutonic Kitten"
It's not better than sex, but it runs it a close second.Comment
-
Actually charge coolers are more efficient than inter coolers, why do you think the IC cores are so big compared to a comparable charge cooler cores.
This is because water is better at cooling than air is (it has a higher latent heat). The only problem is that the pre-radiator before the chargecooler uses air as a heat transfer path.
So i suppose use a chargecooler with a big pre-rad and a decent pump
The ONLY S2 Golf!
http://www.s2forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19402
10.42@138mph
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0wnkkOfFpXgComment
Comment