any vr6 swapped S2's or CQ's out there?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • my2000apb
    S2Forum Maniac
    • Jul 2010
    • 637
    • Country: United States

    #31
    Originally posted by Mcstiff
    This seems to contradict the reality of many >400 whp VR6T's running around
    hahahah yeah no **** right ahahah

    i wonder how many 400+wh vrts were at waterfest, prob more than s2's with upgraded turbos here hahahahaha
    BEAST '90 CQ 24v VRT / O1E / v8 rear, HOLSET SUPER 40 http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=193#p37887
    DD '86 4kq BLAZE, swapping aba/16vT and O1E http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=201#p38264

    Comment

    • my2000apb
      S2Forum Maniac
      • Jul 2010
      • 637
      • Country: United States

      #32
      Originally posted by pixsaudisex2
      Seriously vr6 lumps suck.
      u suck, go away
      BEAST '90 CQ 24v VRT / O1E / v8 rear, HOLSET SUPER 40 http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=193#p37887
      DD '86 4kq BLAZE, swapping aba/16vT and O1E http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=201#p38264

      Comment

      • Error404
        Super Moderator
        • Mar 2007
        • 19789
        • Country: United Kingdom

        #33
        who let the baby trolls in?
        Panthero Coupé quattro 20vt
        Indigo ABY coupé
        Imola B6 S4 Avant

        Comment

        • pixsaudisex2
          S2Forum Possessed
          • Sep 2004
          • 3110

          #34
          Originally posted by my2000apb
          u suck, go away
          What about they gay plastic bits that bust in the engines at o about 170bhp. :corey: under the cam chain bit..

          Comment

          • Jamo
            Retired OG Mod
            • Mar 2004
            • 21750
            • Country: United Kingdom

            #35
            If you want to use a vr6 go ahead and do it, Vr6 longterm are an awful engine to own in comparison to the bullet proof I5

            If you then begin talking about the 3.2 R32 engine which is not referred to plainly as the "VR6" in the UK btw then you have a better power base to use which can make good power when supercharged or turbo charged same goes for the 3.6 versions

            Comment

            • Jamo
              Retired OG Mod
              • Mar 2004
              • 21750
              • Country: United Kingdom

              #36
              Keep this thread sensible or it will go away forever

              Comment

              • URQguy
                S2Forum Addict
                • Sep 2008
                • 245
                • Country: United States

                #37
                Originally posted by pixsaudisex2
                What about they gay plastic bits that bust in the engines at o about 170bhp. :corey: under the cam chain bit..
                The cam belt tensioner? Every chain driven motor that exists uses a "plastic" slider for the gears. They do break, but in 100k mile intervals. That is like hating on the I520v because the stupid belt thing breaks and bends all your intake valves on 160hp motors. I think the 12v VR6 gets a bad reputation because they are not maintained. Picture who drives 12v vr6 jetta's and golfs and who drives 20vt vehicles like the s2, s4, s6, RR or SQ. I think the latter is more likely to change oil in regular intervals, do belts often, or stop driving the thing if it sounds like marbles are bouncing around. For every 400k miles s2 there is a 400k mile mk3 Jetta running around.

                And Jamo, the r32/r36 motors are sweet out of the box. THey do suffer from thinned out cylinder walls that result in cracked bores when the power is elevated to around 700whp. For this reason, the ticket is to get a 24v bottom end that came in 2.8L variations, and bore them out to 2.9L or 3.0L and then use the r32 head which has HUGE ports and valves compared to the standard 24v head. This is all pretty expensive though, as the r32 head fetches premium dollars, and the built bottom end is just as expensive as any other bottom end. That setup is capable of over 1000whp as the boys over in Fremont California explored.

                Look, people can hate on the vr6 all they want. I was kindof torqued off when I realized this thread had been locked yesterday. People for whatever reason associate the vw/audi joint venture of hte vr6 in another world. Every VR6 part has audi rings on it.

                To say that the s2 forums should only be about i520vt is about stupid. THere used to be a place called 20v.org. I could see them getting their panties in a bunch over vr6 talk, but come now. There are killer SQ threads, RR/URQ threads, urS car threads and the occasional b5 s4 thread. Is there not a 5 page thread on a c5 rs6 or a e39m5? Did people not like hte e39M5 because it is a sweet piece of machinery? I am a car guy, and thats why I love hte e39m5. For the same reason, I can appreciate vr swaps like this one..

                1981 URQuattro with the TIAL GT35r.
                2007 Infinity g35

                Comment

                • sam80quattro
                  S2Forum Extremist
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 1496
                  • Country: United Kingdom

                  #38
                  vr6's are rubbish, look how far you haveto lean over to put oil in it lol

                  Comment

                  • URQguy
                    S2Forum Addict
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 245
                    • Country: United States

                    #39
                    Originally posted by sam80quattro
                    vr6's are rubbish, look how far you haveto lean over to put oil in it lol
                    That must mean that my i5 lump is REALLY rubbish as the oil fill is even further!!!!


                    1981 URQuattro with the TIAL GT35r.
                    2007 Infinity g35

                    Comment

                    • my2000apb
                      S2Forum Maniac
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 637
                      • Country: United States

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Jamo
                      Keep this thread sensible or it will go away forever
                      sorry, will do


                      clean and poloite from here on out

                      no excuses but i was really shocked at all teh negative comments, esp on a motor that you guys have very little expirience with compared to the i5
                      BEAST '90 CQ 24v VRT / O1E / v8 rear, HOLSET SUPER 40 http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=193#p37887
                      DD '86 4kq BLAZE, swapping aba/16vT and O1E http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=201#p38264

                      Comment

                      • my2000apb
                        S2Forum Maniac
                        • Jul 2010
                        • 637
                        • Country: United States

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Jamo
                        If you want to use a vr6 go ahead and do it, Vr6 longterm are an awful engine to own in comparison to the bullet proof I5

                        If you then begin talking about the 3.2 R32 engine which is not referred to plainly as the "VR6" in the UK btw then you have a better power base to use which can make good power when supercharged or turbo charged same goes for the 3.6 versions
                        actually like hank mentioned below the r32 isnt the best starting turbo platform, its the same block as the 2.8L but with much thinner cylinder walls, the hot ticket build is r32 head that flows a ton and the bullet proff 2.8L bottom end with thick strong cylinder walls
                        BEAST '90 CQ 24v VRT / O1E / v8 rear, HOLSET SUPER 40 http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=193#p37887
                        DD '86 4kq BLAZE, swapping aba/16vT and O1E http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=201#p38264

                        Comment

                        • my2000apb
                          S2Forum Maniac
                          • Jul 2010
                          • 637
                          • Country: United States

                          #42
                          Originally posted by URQguy
                          The cam belt tensioner? Every chain driven motor that exists uses a "plastic" slider for the gears. They do break, but in 100k mile intervals. That is like hating on the I520v because the stupid belt thing breaks and bends all your intake valves on 160hp motors. I think the 12v VR6 gets a bad reputation because they are not maintained. Picture who drives 12v vr6 jetta's and golfs and who drives 20vt vehicles like the s2, s4, s6, RR or SQ. I think the latter is more likely to change oil in regular intervals, do belts often, or stop driving the thing if it sounds like marbles are bouncing around. For every 400k miles s2 there is a 400k mile mk3 Jetta running around.

                          And Jamo, the r32/r36 motors are sweet out of the box. THey do suffer from thinned out cylinder walls that result in cracked bores when the power is elevated to around 700whp. For this reason, the ticket is to get a 24v bottom end that came in 2.8L variations, and bore them out to 2.9L or 3.0L and then use the r32 head which has HUGE ports and valves compared to the standard 24v head. This is all pretty expensive though, as the r32 head fetches premium dollars, and the built bottom end is just as expensive as any other bottom end. That setup is capable of over 1000whp as the boys over in Fremont California explored.

                          Look, people can hate on the vr6 all they want. I was kindof torqued off when I realized this thread had been locked yesterday. People for whatever reason associate the vw/audi joint venture of hte vr6 in another world. Every VR6 part has audi rings on it.

                          To say that the s2 forums should only be about i520vt is about stupid. THere used to be a place called 20v.org. I could see them getting their panties in a bunch over vr6 talk, but come now. There are killer SQ threads, RR/URQ threads, urS car threads and the occasional b5 s4 thread. Is there not a 5 page thread on a c5 rs6 or a e39m5? Did people not like hte e39M5 because it is a sweet piece of machinery? I am a car guy, and thats why I love hte e39m5. For the same reason, I can appreciate vr swaps like this one..


                          thanks hank, I appreciate the support

                          I def agree n the vr golf people, ahha they just drive, never change oil, belts etc they drive til it breaks down on the side of the road, they are typically teenagers and beater/commuter cars ahaha

                          Yeah the 2.8L bottom end and r32 head gives you the flow and strength to make big numbers and not break.

                          I too was quite angry when it was locked, im glad it open again and we will keep it clean.


                          Think outside the box guys, would you be equally wound up if I put a 4.2fsi rs4 motor in the cq? That has all sorts of carbon issues etc, as allmotors have some reengineering to be done, that’s part of the challenge of making something unique
                          BEAST '90 CQ 24v VRT / O1E / v8 rear, HOLSET SUPER 40 http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=193#p37887
                          DD '86 4kq BLAZE, swapping aba/16vT and O1E http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=201#p38264

                          Comment

                          • Jamo
                            Retired OG Mod
                            • Mar 2004
                            • 21750
                            • Country: United Kingdom

                            #43
                            Originally posted by URQguy
                            The cam belt tensioner? Every chain driven motor that exists uses a "plastic" slider for the gears. They do break, but in 100k mile intervals. That is like hating on the I520v because the stupid belt thing breaks and bends all your intake valves on 160hp motors. I think the 12v VR6 gets a bad reputation because they are not maintained. Picture who drives 12v vr6 jetta's and golfs and who drives 20vt vehicles like the s2, s4, s6, RR or SQ. I think the latter is more likely to change oil in regular intervals, do belts often, or stop driving the thing if it sounds like marbles are bouncing around. For every 400k miles s2 there is a 400k mile mk3 Jetta running around.

                            And Jamo, the r32/r36 motors are sweet out of the box. THey do suffer from thinned out cylinder walls that result in cracked bores when the power is elevated to around 700whp. For this reason, the ticket is to get a 24v bottom end that came in 2.8L variations, and bore them out to 2.9L or 3.0L and then use the r32 head which has HUGE ports and valves compared to the standard 24v head. This is all pretty expensive though, as the r32 head fetches premium dollars, and the built bottom end is just as expensive as any other bottom end. That setup is capable of over 1000whp as the boys over in Fremont California explored.

                            Look, people can hate on the vr6 all they want. I was kindof torqued off when I realized this thread had been locked yesterday. People for whatever reason associate the vw/audi joint venture of hte vr6 in another world. Every VR6 part has audi rings on it.

                            To say that the s2 forums should only be about i520vt is about stupid. THere used to be a place called 20v.org. I could see them getting their panties in a bunch over vr6 talk, but come now. There are killer SQ threads, RR/URQ threads, urS car threads and the occasional b5 s4 thread. Is there not a 5 page thread on a c5 rs6 or a e39m5? Did people not like hte e39M5 because it is a sweet piece of machinery? I am a car guy, and thats why I love hte e39m5. For the same reason, I can appreciate vr swaps like this one..
                            Interesting info on the blocks, The r32 is the flavour of the month in v6 terms for conversions with a lot of twin turbo conversions and a lot of broken chains..

                            When I had my exhaust done one was being rebuilt in the shop, common complaint.

                            VR6 had it's day as engine of the time in the 90's to be honest in the U.K, now the 1.8t is the engine of choice for many conversions leaving the VR6's behind

                            Personally I can't see the gain of the VR6 over the I5 but then I do have a stroker engine

                            Mainly it's VW you will see use the Vr6's variants in the cars, just the way things have gone down over the years

                            Comment

                            • my2000apb
                              S2Forum Maniac
                              • Jul 2010
                              • 637
                              • Country: United States

                              #44
                              yeah jamo i see where youre coming from, the 1.8ts are great light little poweful motors, they too have their issues, timing belts/tensioners/ water pump etc 20vt i4 vs 20vt i5


                              both snapping belts and killing cylinder heads


                              a lot of the vr appeal is its displacement relative to the size of the motors physical dimensions

                              i think if they were as readily availible to you as they are to us, then you would see more people working with them and pushing their limits
                              BEAST '90 CQ 24v VRT / O1E / v8 rear, HOLSET SUPER 40 http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=193#p37887
                              DD '86 4kq BLAZE, swapping aba/16vT and O1E http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=201#p38264

                              Comment

                              • my2000apb
                                S2Forum Maniac
                                • Jul 2010
                                • 637
                                • Country: United States

                                #45
                                when you say the vr6 hhad its days in the 90's, those were 12v's!!!!!!!!!!!


                                24v will outlfow the 12v by epic amounts
                                BEAST '90 CQ 24v VRT / O1E / v8 rear, HOLSET SUPER 40 http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=193#p37887
                                DD '86 4kq BLAZE, swapping aba/16vT and O1E http://www.theprojectpad.com/viewtop...1&t=201#p38264

                                Comment

                                Working...