You can change the style the forum displays by selecting your preferred style at the bottom left of the site.
We have made an enhancement so that old threads should now link from search results to the correct thread. This is not yet in place for single post links
50 hp on w/m is a little bit on the optimistic side
On contrary. It is on the pessmistic side. Especially on a dyno, as they measure IAT at inlet and not from IAT sensor on the car.
Example: HX35 Super <450hp without meth, 520 with.
On contrary. It is on the pessmistic side. Especially on a dyno, as they measure IAT at inlet and not from IAT sensor on the car.
Example: HX35 Super <450hp without meth, 520 with.
Mine did 485 without and 507 with
Only one 550cc jet and probably pretty safe mapping...
RED Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI TME nº 16 of 250 BLACK Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI TME nº 189 of 250
LWB Audi Sport Quattro project
On contrary. It is on the pessmistic side. Especially on a dyno, as they measure IAT at inlet and not from IAT sensor on the car.
Example: HX35 Super <450hp without meth, 520 with.
That's almost as good as using nitro. Sorry I find it hard to believe whatever results you can produce. But that is just me and I could be wrong as I have been many times.
That's almost as good as using nitro. Sorry I find it hard to believe whatever results you can produce. But that is just me and I could be wrong as I have been many times.
I'll post up some dyno graphs later on.
We extra did a comparison to compare hp with and without w/m injection.
RS4 also goes from 440ish to 520 on dyno with WM install and proper mapping.
Only one 550cc jet and probably pretty safe mapping...
Yes your engine had a hugely worked head and very good profile cams. So the gains on w/m just by increasing timing need to be adjusted on the rest of the head work then. So saying to someone on the forum you will gain 50 hp on w/m without taking into account the rest of the engine I take it as a mean hp of gain. So then w/m can give you anything between nothing and 100 hp? :confused:
Talking about GT3076R + 7A cams, the best option is 0,63 or 0,82 A/R?
30R with 7A cams it will be very difficult to go from 1st gear to 2nd.
0.63 housing will choke that turbo pretty hard as well, you can't use the full potential of the compressor with it.
30R with 7A cams it will be very difficult to go from 1st gear to 2nd.
0.63 housing will choke that turbo pretty hard as well, you can't use the full potential of the compressor with it.
So in this case GT30 + std cams is the best solution for this turbo.
I'm seeing that the use of 7A cams is very restrict. I have 7A cams and I would like to use, in this case GT3071R 0,63 is the best option for a engine near 400~450cv.
K26/27 + 7A cams would be a better option? Can K26/27 produce more torque?
K26/K27 will be somewhat lagger...
The only reason to use 7A cams on 3071R really is to somewhat delay the spoolup and then get a better filling at 5500 rpm, which is where peak hp is.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment