stroker with 92,8 crank.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rxl
    S2Forum Extremist
    • May 2012
    • 1913
    • Country: Germany

    #31
    in fist stage im going for alberts k26 Turbo and after that we will see but Need so sort some other things first.
    if i rev to stock Limit i think it will be enought..
    so ported head with stronger springs,titanium retainers and lighter hydros and oversize valves are a good Combo for this stroker?

    ordered a new oil pump form stealers for my build and they said that the gasket for the oil pump is NLA.. crazy ****...

    Comment

    • Quattronaut
      S2Forum Addict
      • May 2013
      • 273
      • Country: Germany

      #32
      For 92,8 stroker and that kind of K26 I think titanium retainers and stiffer springs are not yet necessary, but ok, if you want...they are at least no downgrade :-) but the lighter lifters I would avoid. They are less reliable than stock ones, still in higher revs, as I heard several times. And you do not need the high revs; with that turbo, I estimate full torque between 3000 and 3500 rpm and peak power between 6000 and 6500, so why rev up to 7500? This will be a really great setup without revving out to max :-)

      Comment

      • rxl
        S2Forum Extremist
        • May 2012
        • 1913
        • Country: Germany

        #33
        It's for the second stage.. So stock hydros and everything modified? Do I need to modify the pistons if I get oversize valves?

        Comment

        • Quattronaut
          S2Forum Addict
          • May 2013
          • 273
          • Country: Germany

          #34
          I for myself would recommend stock hydros, yes. For really higher revs then maybe mechanical ones, but the step between it, with lightweight hydro ones, I would not do. Just my 2 cent. There is a thread in this forum with explanations to lighter ones and a good link.

          I do not know what pistons you´ll take- I don´t even know, if there are genuine ones that fit. Heard rumours about the TFSI ones to fit- but just rumours so probably pistons have to be machined anyway. I haven´t heard about problems with bigger valves hitting pistons- CR is low, so there should be much space But that´s other people to answer surely

          Comment

          • andy10v
            S2Forum Zealot
            • Mar 2009
            • 5996
            • Country: Scotland

            #35
            I would not use the lightweight hydraulic lifters, they have collapsed and taken out a few engines new.



            Current-2004 Impreza PPP wagon

            Sold-92 3B coupe-RS2+, 996s, konis, rear torsen, forged rods........
            Sold ABY-stock

            Comment

            • rxl
              S2Forum Extremist
              • May 2012
              • 1913
              • Country: Germany

              #36
              so standard hydros
              anything else that is not to upgrade in the engine?

              Comment

              • rxl
                S2Forum Extremist
                • May 2012
                • 1913
                • Country: Germany

                #37
                Originally posted by Quattronaut
                I for myself would recommend stock hydros, yes. For really higher revs then maybe mechanical ones, but the step between it, with lightweight hydro ones, I would not do. Just my 2 cent. There is a thread in this forum with explanations to lighter ones and a good link.

                I do not know what pistons you´ll take- I don´t even know, if there are genuine ones that fit. Heard rumours about the TFSI ones to fit- but just rumours so probably pistons have to be machined anyway. I haven´t heard about problems with bigger valves hitting pistons- CR is low, so there should be much space But that´s other people to answer surely
                going for custom pistons..

                Comment

                Working...