We've talked around this subject before, and I know that when I tested my WG, and a lower mileage spare from an RS2 that I bought ages ago I saw the same behaviour.
Hooked up a compressed air line to the WG centre chamber (where the WGFV normally connects) and discovered this chamber is not air tight.
Its not because a leak into the upper chamber via the diaphragm, but because the air must leak along the valve guide, and presumably past the control valve seat and into the lower chamber.
Now if I can push compressed air through that route, then a small amount of exhaust gas could also push past in the opposite direction during high boost running, and potentially get into the turbo intake whilst the WGFV is directing air to the MAF hose.
Tested my car yesterday with the WGFV disonnected and saw only 0.4bar boost with the WG spring alone. My WG is totally stock and has never been messed with.
So, I have a couple of questions - that I can't answer as my spare WG is in storage.
1. Can this behaviour be improved by stiffening the spring - effectively clamping the valve tighter into its seat and reducing WG 'creep' ?
2. Can the WG valve and the seat in the lower chamber be ground like a normal engine valve for an improved gas seal ?
The reason for Q2 is the WG valve must build up a certain amount of carbon deposits over time and that is bound to prevent it from making an airtight seal.
The reason I ask is that my car now has an annoying whistle on max boost - could be a shot turbo after 125k miles (some quite harshly driven) - or a cracked EM, but I also want to rule out the possibility of a worn WG.
I know some lads on the forum have access to machine shops so it should be easy to get the WG reconditioned/upgraded to a (more) airtight state of play. I'd happily offer up my spare one to scientific research, but its in storage...
Paul
Hooked up a compressed air line to the WG centre chamber (where the WGFV normally connects) and discovered this chamber is not air tight.
Its not because a leak into the upper chamber via the diaphragm, but because the air must leak along the valve guide, and presumably past the control valve seat and into the lower chamber.
Now if I can push compressed air through that route, then a small amount of exhaust gas could also push past in the opposite direction during high boost running, and potentially get into the turbo intake whilst the WGFV is directing air to the MAF hose.
Tested my car yesterday with the WGFV disonnected and saw only 0.4bar boost with the WG spring alone. My WG is totally stock and has never been messed with.
So, I have a couple of questions - that I can't answer as my spare WG is in storage.
1. Can this behaviour be improved by stiffening the spring - effectively clamping the valve tighter into its seat and reducing WG 'creep' ?
2. Can the WG valve and the seat in the lower chamber be ground like a normal engine valve for an improved gas seal ?
The reason for Q2 is the WG valve must build up a certain amount of carbon deposits over time and that is bound to prevent it from making an airtight seal.
The reason I ask is that my car now has an annoying whistle on max boost - could be a shot turbo after 125k miles (some quite harshly driven) - or a cracked EM, but I also want to rule out the possibility of a worn WG.
I know some lads on the forum have access to machine shops so it should be easy to get the WG reconditioned/upgraded to a (more) airtight state of play. I'd happily offer up my spare one to scientific research, but its in storage...
Paul

is a bit concerning for me.
I will see what i can do tho for you
Comment