Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Staggered wheels on C4 S6

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Staggered wheels on C4 S6

    Hello

    Tried using the search but couldnt get a definitive answer..

    Looking at getting a set of staggered wheels for my C4 S6 (97 AAN auto avant)

    Provided I keep the overall diameter of the wheel and tyre combinations the same is there any risk of damaging the transmission

    For example; using a 235/40/18 tyres on 8J front wheels with 265/35/18 on a 9.5j rear would have roughly the same rolling radius (+/- 1mm)

    Would the additional weight of the larger rear wheel/tyre have any impact?

    Apologies in advance if this is a noob question I've only ever had RWD cars so have never had to worry about this!

    Cheers
    Max



    Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk


  • #2
    The old quattro sytem realy insn't designed to tollerate different diameters on the axles, that said it could be done...

    However, to be honest I wouldn't risk it, tyre's can vary quite a bit from differnt manufactures then by up to 6mm while wearing.

    Plus you's need to carry two spares.
    1989 B3 2.0 3A 80 quattro... Budget 1.8T Project.
    1992 C4 100 2.8 Avant quattro... Mobile Sitting Room.
    1995 RS2... MTM K26/7 380 BHP Conversion.
    1990 Corrado G60... Breaking For Parts.

    Comment


    • #3
      I should correct myself... One spare would do the job, however as I said tyres can vary in size a surprising amount from different manufactures, even when they're supposed to be the same exact size.

      I seem to recall reading somewhere in my factory manual that one should use the same brand all round and swap them front to back halfway through their life cycle. This maybe being over fussy, I've purchased breakers in the past with a different brand and wildly varying amounts of tread on each corner and they've still driven fine.

      I don't think the extra weight would be a problem but I'd want to be sure the tyres are actully the same diameter +/- a couple of mm when new. Though then you've got the problem of not being able to swap them front to back to even out the wear.

      If you simply want to fill the archs more on the back then I'd consider using spacers and retaining the same size rims and tyres.
      1989 B3 2.0 3A 80 quattro... Budget 1.8T Project.
      1992 C4 100 2.8 Avant quattro... Mobile Sitting Room.
      1995 RS2... MTM K26/7 380 BHP Conversion.
      1990 Corrado G60... Breaking For Parts.

      Comment


      • #4
        265 won’t go. 255 is very much a squeeze.
        Rob..
        94 RS2 Noggy,LHD,MTM map,18"cup 1s,245/35/18,Bilsteins,RS2 H&Rs,Cup splitter.
        87 UR 20v ABY
        97 S6 Avant
        96 A6 C4 2.5 TDI quattro avant,Ming,Wietec/eibach,chipped
        1967 Ford Mustang,Eleanor,460ci v8

        Comment


        • #5
          I wouldn’t go smaller on the front. They understeer enough!! 9.5 all round on mine.
          Rob..
          94 RS2 Noggy,LHD,MTM map,18"cup 1s,245/35/18,Bilsteins,RS2 H&Rs,Cup splitter.
          87 UR 20v ABY
          97 S6 Avant
          96 A6 C4 2.5 TDI quattro avant,Ming,Wietec/eibach,chipped
          1967 Ford Mustang,Eleanor,460ci v8

          Comment


          • #6
            No where near as extream, however I've fitted 235/55/16's all round on my C4 Avant, though it only has stock arches so not as much space to fill.
            1989 B3 2.0 3A 80 quattro... Budget 1.8T Project.
            1992 C4 100 2.8 Avant quattro... Mobile Sitting Room.
            1995 RS2... MTM K26/7 380 BHP Conversion.
            1990 Corrado G60... Breaking For Parts.

            Comment


            • #7
              Yes, you would absolutely be okay doing that. Porsche does this on AWD 911s for example. As long as the rotating diameters are within 1-2% of each other you are fine.

              Comment

              Working...
              X