You can change the style the forum displays by selecting your preferred style at the bottom left of the site.
We have made an enhancement so that old threads should now link from search results to the correct thread. This is not yet in place for single post links
I've got five spare but they are in good nick so I dont really want to butcher them, if you dont mind it would be useful to know how thick the crown is.
I see you don't pay attention to my posts, guys......
Blame on you
Just kidding. I took some mesurement some time ago without cutting the piston in a half, so might be interesting to see if I did some mistake when measuring....
Marcos drawings look right - I fancied chopping one up anyway.
I can't find my calipers to take accurate measurements (it's a pain having half my tools at another garage) but 7 mm in the centre looks correct - measured on a wooden ruler
I think we need to flatten the top surface AND take it, very slightly, below the dish point to get 8.7:1. Marco did some calculations elsewhere I think
Originally posted by Doug_RS2
........I think we need to flatten the top surface AND take it, very slightly, below the dish point to get 8.7:1. Marco did some calculations elsewhere I think........
I made some rough calculations on how much to take off the piston crown to lower CR but cannot remember where it was posted.
Let's try to figure out indicatively.
Some approssimation must although be made because of the 0.7mm protruding area between the intake valve pockets and the valve pockets themselves, unless some empirical measuring method is used (burette and fluid).
1) Piston total area @ 81.5 mm bore = 52.14 cm^2;
2) OEM dish area = 27.33 (Ø 59 mm);
3) OEM protruding squish volume = ~ 0.4 cc
This means taking piston top flat where OEM dish is, will reduce volume ~ 3.36 cc.
Going to the 4.2 cc will need cutting away another ~ 0.16 mm from top of piston so if OEM min thickness is 8mm it will be reduced to 7.84 mm ....... Which doesn't look so scary to me.
I would rather be carefull about lowering piston hight related to block deck. This way you're actually increasing squish hight at TDC of ~1.36 mm which could not be the right way to go. You lower CR to raise knock limits and use more boost, but reducing squish effect could actually even make things worse.
Before going this route I would suggest you get some feedback from credible people who has experimented this, or just think on going the originary route.
I mean you're putting a lot of money and effort on your project, so two or three weeks and a hundred of bucks (but are you sure OEM pistons are cheaper?) shouldn't be your primary concern.
well as i said at the beginning thats why i wanted to buy anew set of pistons. but waiting time is too long.otherwise they are worth the value in my opinion.i dont know the term in english but difference between top of block and piston top aint good.
Yes timucin - the Ross pistons require a very large gap due to the amount of expansion at higher temperatures. So it is critical you know what temeratures they will run at - I presume (maybe wrongly) this will be different if you decide to use NOS?
High perf. pistons manufacturers usually ask how much power / boost and which use the engine will be put at, providing consequently the right product with the right clearance specs (you actually tell them your precise final bore size, and they do the rest).
If your concern is piston's behaviour at warm up, I think you can be pretty safe with both Wiseco or JE which really have a great consideration worldwide with high performance applications not only for track or competition vehicles.
Of course you might need to be a little carefull not to blast full load when warming the engine up (but it should be a good habit on stock engines as well).
And I think you should of course agree to keep some little drawbacks in exchange with having a 200+ hp per liter engine with over 600 hp potential on it.
Anyway I would like to point out I'm just having the same problems and doubts as you do. I'm trying to get the best I can out of my engine and belive me, I really don't have money to waste.
Sharing infos and talking to each other hopefully will allow each of us to make the right choices......or the wrong ones, but with consciousness
I was just wondering about timucins situation though - what happens if you are running crap octane fuel most of the time but also occasionally run NOS? Would the occasional times he runs NOS cause problems with pistons being cooler and maybe larger gaps?
I have no experience of this and just learning as I go along - maybe there is nothing to worry about.
The conversations we have on here help though.
I am waiting on a response from JE.
Out of interest Marco - are you using gapless rings?
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment