You can change the style the forum displays by selecting your preferred style at the bottom left of the site.
We have made an enhancement so that old threads should now link from search results to the correct thread. This is not yet in place for single post links
Timucin,
Ricardo and I are having problems with MAF.
First Ricardo broke 4 MAFs. I thought that it was due to the oil from the breather.
Now, I upgraded my turbo and tried to run a higher boost, but the MAF gave up at 1,5bar of boost, and I have no oil return to the intake. It was running ok with 1,2bar. When I rose the boost and went to test drive...the hot wire gave up.
I think that this is a problem even at 420hp level.
I thought that my bottle neck was going to be the EM, but it turned to be the MAF.
I already have the big MAF (used on the Sport Quattro , Porsche 928 and old M5) but nobody seens to knows how to connect it to the RS2 plug. It is electricaly different from the original MAF.
Originally posted by S2 Ant might sound silly but in terms of actual ride, is the difference in feeling tat big from say 350 to 400 or 400 to say 450?
a 50bhp increase surely wouldnt realy be that noticeable?
Don't forget that a 50BHP increase is very noticable when you're comparing S2 stock with a stage 1 ECU mod? I guess it's a % increase that makes the difference - 50BHP increase over 220 is a big overall % increase, whereas 50BHP when you've already got 400 is less?
Oh I don't know, I'm losing it
Ex S2 owner, now running around in an A4 Avant quattro...
Originally posted by Habib Yes it was the red S2 with 428hp. it reached 60 in 3.9s. I read in one of the articles. If I find that article ill post it up.
Originally posted by dan_b Don't forget that a 50BHP increase is very noticable when you're comparing S2 stock with a stage 1 ECU mod? I guess it's a % increase that makes the difference - 50BHP increase over 220 is a big overall % increase, whereas 50BHP when you've already got 400 is less?
yeh thats absolutely correct it is a percentage thing. My point was more that 50bhp increase from say 350bhp is only around 30bhp per tonne, which isnt that much, and as a percentage isnt that much either.
need to compare actual performance figures from 350 and 400 to see if all the extra £££ is worth it
Ant
2007 Mk5 Golf GTi, 3 door, DSG, REVO Stg 2 and other goodies
2011 Kawasaki Z1000
When you have 27.5bhp from a side valve Morris Minor, 50Bhp is a big improvement. Adding a superchargeer to the stock engine takes it to 48 Bhp which is good for 85Mph. Originally it could manage 58MPH 0-50 was 25 seconds + I've got 2 x superchargers sitting in the garage hmmmmm
Power
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment