You can change the style the forum displays by selecting your preferred style at the bottom left of the site.
We have made an enhancement so that old threads should now link from search results to the correct thread. This is not yet in place for single post links
Yeah but u need at very least a home fries, I could not lose a Toyota starlet turbo last night:eek2: . Driving home after selling my wheels came up behind him passed him and another couple o cars looked in my rear view and there he was up till about 120 where he dropped back. Slowed for cars went for it again he was right up my RS . Where has my evo gone.
Originally posted by Albert I'm are using TDi bearings ... works very good. I did not know the name for that in english
the TDI bearings are nothing else but RS2, check the part numbers for yourself.
There's also some other smart dudes who were going like "my d*ck is bigger than yours cuz I'm using TDI bearings" and **** me the TDI bearings are nothing more than RS2 simply because Audi has never needed anything stronger.
'98 Silver Grey 2.7T S4, dual 2.75" turbo back exhaust with no cats, FMIC, BIG injectors, 10 Bar motorsport fuel pump, modded RS4 turbos, tubular exhaust manifolds, custom intakes, RS4 MAF, Bilstein PSS9, H&R ARBs, 19" BBS CH, custom remap, 511 BHP/505ft-lbs
@Paul M - The spare ECU was despatched yesterday am. Dunno if Royal Mail's special delivery service will get all the way to Banff in one day, but should be Friday latest.
.....I've never seen any testing on them, but I suspect the ABY / ADU rods are lighter to partially counteract the higher rotating mass of that damn DM flywheel.
Cheers,
Paul
Paul, since flywheel mass is partially needed to work as an "energy storage" unit to compensate for inertial energy fluctuations, if the conrods are lighter (at least the reciprocating part of it), you actually need a smaller flywheel mass.
The bigger and heavier dual mass flywheel (much heavier than what it is actually needed as "energy storage"), for what I can understand of it, is meant to give better "fluctuating forces" absorbtion (thus having a smoother idling and revving engine) whitout giving too much strain to the cranckshaft because of the slightly flexible connection of the two parts of it.
This, at least, is what I can actually figure out. Any other idea welcome.
Yes - I agree on DM flywheel being primarily of benefit to smooth running and shock absorption. I have a factory booklet on this thing - its full of springs and stuff - quite complex and costly.
I have no evidence on 3B or ABY conrod weights - just thinking out loud.
Originally posted by Mihnea the TDI bearings are nothing else but RS2, check the part numbers for yourself.
There's also some other smart dudes who were going like "my d*ck is bigger than yours cuz I'm using TDI bearings" and **** me the TDI bearings are nothing more than RS2 simply because Audi has never needed anything stronger.
but there are diferent TDi's ... ether way ... form what You say I have the right one
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment