Low boost, high fuel consumption and 00561 fault

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • prj
    replied
    Originally posted by LitD
    Not if I can see hole in it it's not, bearing in mind I don't have a pressure testing kit to hand. Plus it was full of oil when I pulled it off, so I'd expect to see some oil spray from a hole if there was one.
    There are two options - you get a pressure test kit, or you sell/break the car.
    There are a million places where it can leak from and you are never going to find it without a pressure tester.

    Leave a comment:


  • simon20vq
    replied
    I would check the temp sender on the back of the head and the o2 sensor.

    Leave a comment:


  • LitD
    replied
    Not if I can see hole in it it's not, bearing in mind I don't have a pressure testing kit to hand. Plus it was full of oil when I pulled it off, so I'd expect to see some oil spray from a hole if there was one.

    Leave a comment:


  • prj
    replied
    Have you pressure tested the car ?
    Pulling off hoses is a waste of time.

    Leave a comment:


  • LitD
    replied
    I took the Michelin Man hose today and other than being full of oil, there's nothing wrong with it that I can see, it actually looks pretty new. There is also no play in the turbo shaft. The saga continues.

    Leave a comment:


  • UrS4boy
    replied
    Originally posted by prj
    Most people for some reason do not test the multitude of systems attached for the inlet manifold thus resulting in huge overtime during mapping process because the car does not make any boost and is pig rich. I flat out refuse to map anything before pressure testing it these days.
    I understand your frustration. I will revise my boost testing option posts according (BUT I will still leave "options" - but with stronger recommendations for some options over others).

    Leave a comment:


  • prj
    replied
    Originally posted by UrS4boy
    Air or liquid will always find the path of least resistance to escape. If the one-way valve is stuck open, there will be a "boost" leak at a lower pressure (if you can even build *any* pressure) that won't open up a split in a boost hose (typically the AAN Michelin Man hose splits only open up at higher boost pressures). So before you are done, you first have to replace the one-way valve and then retest to find the other leaks.
    Or block it off, since it's useless.

    Boost testing is a multi-step/repeat process until there is no more (significant) leaks.
    Correct.

    Most people for some reason do not test the multitude of systems attached for the inlet manifold thus resulting in huge overtime during mapping process because the car does not make any boost and is pig rich.
    I flat out refuse to map anything before pressure testing it these days.

    Leave a comment:


  • UrS4boy
    replied
    Originally posted by prj
    If everything you put in leaks out of the PCV then you know the one way valve under the manifold is shot
    Air or liquid will always find the path of least resistance to escape. If the one-way valve is stuck open, there will be a "boost" leak at a lower pressure (if you can even build *any* pressure) that won't open up a split in a boost hose (typically the AAN Michelin Man hose splits only open up at higher boost pressures). So before you are done, you first have to replace the one-way valve and then retest to find the other leaks.

    This is *NO* different than first isolating the boost hoses (eliminating the PCV system from the test) and pressurizing, finding the leak(s) and replacing the problem hoses/clamps/O-rings and then re-testing to find you still have a boost leak via the PCV system one-way valve.

    Boost testing is a multi-step/repeat process until there is no more (significant) leaks.

    Can we agree on that?

    Leave a comment:


  • prj
    replied
    Originally posted by UrS4boy
    So given [A3] is plugged as above, let's say I follow your (good) suggestion that the cam cover vent hose/port remains unblocked and during the pressure test with the pressurizing bung at the MAF end of the MAF to turbo hose produces air flow out of the cam cover port, what is your conclusion? (It's a trick question).
    I already wrote before:
    Originally posted by prj
    The PCV system never gets pressurized this way. Ever. If everything you put in leaks out of the PCV then you know the one way valve under the manifold is shot.
    The only other reason would be a hole in one of your pistons.

    Some air is supposed to come out of there, as it leaks past the rings, but very little - a minute amount.
    The reason to decouple it from the intake is to prevent pressurizing the sump and having the oil rise up.

    Leave a comment:


  • UrS4boy
    replied
    Originally posted by prj
    Huh no. You only need to remove the hose from the MAF-Turbo hose, block the hole in the MAF-turbo hose, and leave the hose/pipe that comes from the cam cover to atmosphere. Under no circumstances should you block the hose/pipe that comes from the cam cover, unless you want a huge amount of blue smoke afterwards.
    Location [A3] *is* the hole in the MAF-turbo hose formerly connected to the cam cover port. So we agree on that.

    So given [A3] is plugged as above, let's say I follow your (good) suggestion that the cam cover vent hose/port remains unblocked and during the pressure test with the pressurizing bung at the MAF end of the MAF to turbo hose produces air flow out of the cam cover port, what is your conclusion? (It's a trick question).

    Leave a comment:


  • prj
    replied
    Originally posted by UrS4boy
    At least we agree that blocking the PCV outlet on the MAF turbo hose (at the location I labelled as [A3] in my AAN air flow diagram) is needed to prevent putting pressure backward through the PCV system.
    Huh no. You only need to remove the hose from the MAF-Turbo hose, block the hole in the MAF-turbo hose, and leave the hose/pipe that comes from the cam cover to atmosphere.
    Under no circumstances should you block the hose/pipe that comes from the cam cover, unless you want a huge amount of blue smoke afterwards.

    That way the PCV system does not get pressurized at all, because it's vented to atmosphere.
    If you want to specifically test the PCV system, then after you are done with every thing else, put a minute amount of pressure in with the PCV system plumbed in as on a running car, maybe 0.1-0.2 bar. It's not supposed to hold any more than that.

    Leave a comment:


  • UrS4boy
    replied
    At least we agree that blocking the PCV outlet on the MAF turbo hose (at the location I labelled as [A3] in my AAN air flow diagram) is needed to prevent putting pressure backward through the PCV system.

    "Pressurizing any other way than plugging the MAF, blocking the PCV outlet on the MAF turbo hose and maybe pinching the wastegate hose is a complete waste of time"

    That is a good option too. I will revise my Option list to include it as "Option A4".

    Leave a comment:


  • prj
    replied
    Originally posted by UrS4boy
    The different options allow for the isolation of areas of potential leaks
    You do not need to isolate anything. All this is under pressure each and every time you are under boost. So it only makes sense to pressurize everything.
    including NOT pressurizing the PCV system backwards.
    The PCV system never gets pressurized this way. Ever. If everything you put in leaks out of the PCV then you know the one way valve under the manifold is shot.

    Pressurizing any other way than plugging the MAF, blocking the PCV outlet on the MAF turbo hose and maybe pinching the wastegate hose is a complete waste of time. Unfortunately very commonly done in the UK due to being wrongly advocated on this forum, and results in me having to fix tons of leaks before mapping two thirds of the cars that are supposedly "pressure tested".

    Leave a comment:


  • UrS4boy
    replied
    Originally posted by prj
    You do not need to block off the throttle body!That's a horrible idea, because 99% of boost leaks are from the vacuums and other systems connected to the inlet manifold. I don't even know who ever came up with blocking the throttle body, but they should be shot.
    Bit harsh?

    Blocking off the throttle body and ISV inlet hose play out in only 2 of the 6 options I put forward for consideration as boost testing OPTIONS (Options 3 and 6). The different options allow for the isolation of areas of potential leaks, including NOT pressurizing the PCV system backwards.





    Leave a comment:


  • bilko0795
    replied
    Originally posted by prj
    You do not need to block off the throttle body!
    That's a horrible idea, because 99% of boost leaks are from the vacuums and other systems connected to the inlet manifold. I don't even know who ever came up with blocking the throttle body, but they should be shot.
    I have received a numerous amount of cars for mapping where the owner claims it's leak leak free by plugging the throttle body and in fact it won't hold any pressure from the inlet manifold.

    All you need is:
    * Remove MAF, plug it with a bung that has a tire nipple in it.
    * Remove the PCV hose from the MAF to Turbo hose and block it on the MAF-Turbo hose end, leave the other end be.

    That's it. Do NOT plug anything else, as else you will not find leaks.
    Thanks for that info that's maybe why i can't find the leak on my car still.

    Leave a comment:

Working...