rs2 maf vs s2 maf

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Briggsy
    S2Forum Addict
    • Jul 2005
    • 267
    • Country: England

    #16
    well i managed to answer my own question.....i bought a RS2 maf myself and i can say there is no difference between a S2 one and i didnt even have to modify my aby airbox to fit! the diameter is the same so how does the RS2 maf flow more?

    Alan at vagparts done me a great offer, £141 delivered to my door!
    1995 B4 Audi 80 S2 avant 267bhp and 326lbft *sold*

    2001 P38 Range Rover DHSE 159bhp and 255lbft

    1985 Type85 Audi 90 quattro 135bhp 140lbft

    Comment

    • Briggsy
      S2Forum Addict
      • Jul 2005
      • 267
      • Country: England

      #17
      this is for search purpose RS2 maf part number 0 986 280 139 + 0 280 213 017 .
      1995 B4 Audi 80 S2 avant 267bhp and 326lbft *sold*

      2001 P38 Range Rover DHSE 159bhp and 255lbft

      1985 Type85 Audi 90 quattro 135bhp 140lbft

      Comment

      • Jamo
        Retired OG Mod
        • Mar 2004
        • 21750
        • Country: United Kingdom

        #18
        Originally posted by Briggsy
        well i managed to answer my own question.....i bought a RS2 maf myself and i can say there is no difference between a S2 one and i didnt even have to modify my aby airbox to fit! the diameter is the same so how does the RS2 maf flow more?

        Alan at vagparts done me a great offer, £141 delivered to my door!
        Look at the shields on the RS2 compared to the stock. The RS2 shield is less of a restriction and therefore allows quicker air flow.

        Comment

        • Briggsy
          S2Forum Addict
          • Jul 2005
          • 267
          • Country: England

          #19
          has anyone run without any gauze as that would then flow more although a little uneven?
          1995 B4 Audi 80 S2 avant 267bhp and 326lbft *sold*

          2001 P38 Range Rover DHSE 159bhp and 255lbft

          1985 Type85 Audi 90 quattro 135bhp 140lbft

          Comment

          • Jamo
            Retired OG Mod
            • Mar 2004
            • 21750
            • Country: United Kingdom

            #20
            Originally posted by Briggsy
            has anyone run without any gauze as that would then flow more although a little uneven?
            Yep it has been done by a few people. Couple of threads about it.

            If you want read the thread titled "carbon maf" that got a few tongues wagging

            Comment

            • 4WheelDrifter
              S2Forum Zealot
              • Oct 2004
              • 5773
              • Country: Devon

              #21
              Originally posted by Jamo
              Yep it has been done by a few people. Couple of threads about it.
              Yep. BTDT for years.
              Originally posted by Jamo
              If you want read the thread titled "carbon maf" that got a few tongues wagging
              @ the Carbon MAF.
              I might go and see if Tom still has his. It's probably in the bottom drawer with Uber.
              SS

              Comment

              • Thuppu
                S2Forum Freak
                • Sep 2010
                • 4115
                • Country: Finland

                #22
                So is the flow the only difference between stock and RS2 MAF? I have now used the RS2 MAF for a week and seems to be some difference in behavior and AFR(lambda values).

                The car feels more responsive and efficient. On idle the lambda value is now 1.12-1.20. With the stock MAF it was 1.00-1.01.

                On light revs the mix stays quite lean and only on high boost it riches out. On full throttle and boost the lambda is 0.88-0.89. Before it was 0.86 and the mix was whole time on the rich side on light throttle and boost.

                Does these kind MAF's wane bit by bit or does they only die inctancly?

                Audi UrS4 Avant 2.5 20vt - twincharged - Project
                Audi 80q B4 Sedan 2.2 20vt - Daily user
                BMW 320d Touring e91 M-Sport - Daily user
                BMW 740iA e38 - Project

                Comment

                • Rocco
                  S2Forum Zealot
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 6393
                  • Country: Spain

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Thuppu
                  So is the flow the only difference between stock and RS2 MAF? I have now used the RS2 MAF for a week and seems to be some difference in behavior and AFR(lambda values).

                  The car feels more responsive and efficient. On idle the lambda value is now 1.12-1.20. With the stock MAF it was 1.00-1.01.

                  On light revs the mix stays quite lean and only on high boost it riches out. On full throttle and boost the lambda is 0.88-0.89. Before it was 0.86 and the mix was whole time on the rich side on light throttle and boost.

                  Does these kind MAF's wane bit by bit or does they only die inctancly?
                  change the MAF and re install your original one

                  i did something similar around 3 months ago testing 2 diferent 3B Mafs and with the not original one my AFR values were leaner,just as you says

                  i have heard that all or some ECU setups needs to be desinged for the diiferents Mafs ...

                  RED Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI TME nº 16 of 250
                  BLACK Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI TME nº 189 of 250
                  LWB Audi Sport Quattro project

                  Comment

                  • UrS4boy
                    S2Forum Obsessed
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 11859
                    • Country: Canada

                    #24
                    Mass Air Flow (MAF) sensor info.

                    Internally the RS2 MAF and AAN/S2 MAFs are the same. Looking from the inlet end, you can see the difference in restriction to air flow (AAN/S2 on the left, RS2 on the right). On that basis, I have no doubt that the better response that you *think* you are experiencing is real.

                    More MAF info HERE (note link to Paul N's MAF info in there)

                    RS2'd 93 UrS4 5 spd sedan
                    94 UrS4 V8 6 spd manual avant

                    Comment

                    • saltinot
                      S2Forum Extremist
                      • May 2004
                      • 1946

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Briggsy
                      well i managed to answer my own question.....i bought a RS2 maf myself and i can say there is no difference between a S2 one and i didnt even have to modify my aby airbox to fit! the diameter is the same so how does the RS2 maf flow more?

                      Alan at vagparts done me a great offer, £141 delivered to my door!
                      Below is how the RS2 MAF fits to the airbox, both S2 & RS2. You must rotate the MAF as seen in the photo and then mount your bolts. It's still a very tight fit.



                      Comment

                      • Thuppu
                        S2Forum Freak
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 4115
                        • Country: Finland

                        #26
                        Originally posted by UrS4boy
                        Internally the RS2 MAF and AAN/S2 MAFs are the same. Looking from the inlet end, you can see the difference in restriction to air flow (AAN/S2 on the left, RS2 on the right). On that basis, I have no doubt that the better response that you *think* you are experiencing is real.
                        Yes, I'm known about the visible differences, but the difference in the mixture before and after is quite big especially on idle, so I wonder if there are also some other differenceses between theese MAF's..? The reason the efficient is better is propably because the mixture is leaner.

                        Originally posted by Thuppu
                        Does these kind MAF's wane bit by bit or does they only die inctancly?
                        Do you have any opinion about this question? I was thinking if my old AAN MAF was worned a bit when we made the remap... I soon get another AAN MAF for testing, then we see how it works.

                        Audi UrS4 Avant 2.5 20vt - twincharged - Project
                        Audi 80q B4 Sedan 2.2 20vt - Daily user
                        BMW 320d Touring e91 M-Sport - Daily user
                        BMW 740iA e38 - Project

                        Comment

                        • prj
                          S2Forum Zealot
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 6308
                          • Country: Estonia

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Thuppu
                          So is the flow the only difference between stock and RS2 MAF? I have now used the RS2 MAF for a week and seems to be some difference in behavior and AFR(lambda values).

                          The car feels more responsive and efficient. On idle the lambda value is now 1.12-1.20. With the stock MAF it was 1.00-1.01.
                          That means one of the MAF's is off calibration/broken.
                          I have personally swapped two working MAF's on my car and logged AFR, it's exactly the same.

                          On light revs the mix stays quite lean and only on high boost it riches out. On full throttle and boost the lambda is 0.88-0.89. Before it was 0.86 and the mix was whole time on the rich side on light throttle and boost.

                          Does these kind MAF's wane bit by bit or does they only die inctancly?
                          They do slowly get less sensitive.
                          Is the RS2 MAF new? Or is it used?

                          Either way, when fitting two different new/lightly used MAF's I had no change in AFR. And I wasn't looking only on the display of the controller. I actually logged the exact same pull on the exact same piece of road from exact the same RPM's.
                          No difference.
                          http://tuner.ee - http://www.facebook.com/tuner.ee

                          Comment

                          • Thuppu
                            S2Forum Freak
                            • Sep 2010
                            • 4115
                            • Country: Finland

                            #28
                            It's used. If you Dmitri remap a car, can you tell without comparsion if the MAF has seen better days?

                            Audi UrS4 Avant 2.5 20vt - twincharged - Project
                            Audi 80q B4 Sedan 2.2 20vt - Daily user
                            BMW 320d Touring e91 M-Sport - Daily user
                            BMW 740iA e38 - Project

                            Comment

                            • prj
                              S2Forum Zealot
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 6308
                              • Country: Estonia

                              #29
                              Good question.
                              I wouldn't look for it, I don't think...

                              Only thing that would tip me off is if the LOAD on the graph would be really low for a given MAP.
                              http://tuner.ee - http://www.facebook.com/tuner.ee

                              Comment

                              Working...