AAN into Ur quattro, 400-450 Bhp Target

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rocco
    replied
    why do you want to sell this monster? it has to be fast¡ very fast¡

    and yeah,not the best times to sell anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • URquattroGus
    replied
    Been having fun, but I keep daydreaming about other cars too.

    Not sure I could bring myself to do it, but what do you guys think I could sell my car for?

    Not exactly the ideal time to sell.

    Quattro values have firmed up quite a lot recently trhough.

    Of course the scary bit is how much I have spent on the car in the 6 years that I have had it...

    Leave a comment:


  • DJones
    replied
    As said its about how it feels as opposed to pub talk figures, graph looks very respectful to me...

    Must admit I'm enjoying mine more and more with the new turbo set up, in fact I have turned the boost down to 1.8bar and its mighty strong enough when ever you call for it.

    Have fun...

    Leave a comment:


  • prj
    replied
    That's alright, it's a known fact that different dynos read very differently... a dyno is mostly a tuning tool to compare changes, not an absolute measurement tool.
    The car got faster and better to drive, and that's what matters.

    Leave a comment:


  • URquattroGus
    replied
    Interstingly, Damo M who has the urquattro with 2.5L stroker suggested that his dyno results at MRC were almost 80bhp or so higher than the figures he recorded elesewhere....

    That is what he said, not me trying to stir.

    Leave a comment:


  • prj
    replied
    Yes, the turbo is completely maxed, it's boosting with the wastegate shut almost the entire time.

    The torque curve is nice. The power figures are interesting, because I can see from the first logs, that your car got quite a bit quicker after we were done mapping it, so it must be quicker than it was before.

    You can always pressure test it, if you think something is wrong, but IMO about 400 is what this turbo can flow - at least on paper. I was surprised at the 420 MRC figure myself to be honest.

    Leave a comment:


  • URquattroGus
    replied
    Rolling Road Results

    Dyno Results;

    (pdf should be attached?)

    So, low on pub talk. With this same turbo (gtx2867r 0.63) and before head work the MRC dyno read 420bhp. I think that was optimistic.....

    On the old 3071 0.63 also before head work it wss 440 bhp at MRC.

    The car has never felt quicker than now, to me it feels drastically quicker.

    The engine is just such a peach, pretty much no lag and power everywhere i could want

    As you can see the curve looks pretty smooth.

    The AMD rolling road measured my standard Focus RS at 293 bhp (305 Factory figures) and my fathers AMG C63 at 486 (480 Factory quoted) so I think it is there or there abouts for accuracy.

    BTW I did ask PRJ to tune for torque. Not sure there is much left in the turbo really?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • URquattroGus
    replied
    Originally posted by macspring
    In summary, what's the spec of the engine / turbo now?

    Just to have summary in the one post.

    Thanks.
    Thanks guys, maybe I will try a couple more, particularly when I have someone to hold a camera for me.

    Engine spec:
    AAN Engine with stock bore and stroke.
    JNL Racing stage 2 cylinder head
    RS2 Bearings, shells and gaskets
    Standard AAN Cams
    GTX2867R Turbo
    Wagner EVO Exhaust and Inlet Manifolds
    Scat Rods
    Twin Sidemount intercoolers.
    034 High output coils.
    7A cam cover for the looks.
    034 Aluminum Flywheel and Sachs clutch and Pressure plate
    Engine was built up by pete berry at white cottage quattros, as with a lot of the work on the car bar the bits I have done.
    PRJ Custom Remap

    Probably forgotten sonething, but that should give you an idea

    Leave a comment:


  • macspring
    replied
    Angus,

    In summary, what's the spec of the engine / turbo now?

    Just to have summary in the one post.

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • prj
    replied
    Nice to see you are still having fun with it

    Leave a comment:


  • ralleyquattro
    replied
    Great job! Reminds me a lot of mine.
    The lightness of Ur-q is a big strength and helps quick spoolup.
    My friend gave me a bit of a scare taking it for a spin after the tune.
    Lucky it just got a bit dusty..



    Looking forward to more!

    Leave a comment:


  • jsws3
    replied
    Originally posted by URquattroGus
    A few videos that I made yesterday. It's my first attempt. I was too tight to buy a Go Pro so I bought a Muvi HD cam for about £90 with all mounts etc. Overall it's not bad for the money, you can see what you are shooting on the screen and it also comes with a wireless remote.






    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH3QqFWONVI
    Nice vids mate .

    It would be nice to hear it from a distance aprochig the camera and going past into the distance .

    Peter & demitri have done a good job tree mate well done.

    Leave a comment:


  • URquattroGus
    replied
    A few videos that I made yesterday. It's my first attempt. I was too tight to buy a Go Pro so I bought a Muvi HD cam for about £90 with all mounts etc. Overall it's not bad for the money, you can see what you are shooting on the screen and it also comes with a wireless







    Leave a comment:


  • diesel des
    replied
    Nice job Angus!

    Leave a comment:


  • DJones
    replied
    They are certainly very quick cars when converted, mine measured a 60 - 90 time of 2.62 on the Gtech.

    Leave a comment:

Working...