My sleeper

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hammer
    replied
    I will see[emoji6]

    Leave a comment:


  • Wizard-of-OD
    replied
    Originally posted by hammer
    By my Design is less backpressure than this one you Post with the flapper.
    ...thats the whole point. Reducing a twin scroll A/R from X to approx X/2 and then when desired bar/rpm is reached , the flap opens bringing A/R back to X.
    Twin scroll by design only works well on paired cylinders. There is no Triple entry turbine housing (that I know of) so Skyline/Supra folk rely on a 6-1 merge collector followed by a flapper valve. Inline-5's suffer the same fate. Inline-4's however do not.
    Would love to see back to back dyno's though , however , I am skeptical they will be significantly different.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cordoba16vt
    replied
    Can you explain better as to why you closed the oilway from the lifters? What exactly do you mean. And pls show a photo.

    Leave a comment:


  • hammer
    replied
    Closed the oilways from the lifters, because the cam had so high Lift that it will be opend the canals.
    Sorry my Bad english, Hope you understand it

    Leave a comment:


  • hammer
    replied
    By my Design is less backpressure than this one you Post with the flapper.
    Dont no if it work fine, but i will See it in three mounths

    Leave a comment:


  • Wizard-of-OD
    replied
    Originally posted by newsh
    One of the cylinders is shared.
    I can see that , still does not beg the question as to why?

    Please do not take this as criticism and I appreciate the enthusiasm but this was tested in the Volvo community several years ago and did nothing for spool time considering the orientation of the pistons? At no given time are 2 pistons ever @ TDC like an inline-4 so twin scroll is pointless on an inline-5.

    You would have been better off with a 5 into 1 merge collector and running one of the turbine inlets through a flapper boost controlled solenoid like this:

    Leave a comment:


  • V6quattro
    replied
    What oilway's are you closing?

    Leave a comment:


  • Greg_S
    replied
    stunning project. The exhaust manifold is impressive!

    Leave a comment:


  • hammer
    replied
    Made place for the cams

    And closed the oilway

    Leave a comment:


  • hammer
    replied
    Every runner is over 500 mm and all have equal length.
    1-3 2-5 and 4 (is shared for 250 mm back).
    I Designd it for less backpressure and when everything is fine to positiv slope [emoji4]

    Leave a comment:


  • hammer
    replied
    [emoji23]

    Leave a comment:


  • igor136
    replied
    As you can see, the man was using a calculator. This is an innovative and interesting project.

    Leave a comment:


  • newsh
    replied
    Originally posted by Wizard-of-OD
    Cool project but can you run me through the thought process in using a twin scroll set up on an Inline-5 if you have no intentions of shutting off one of the inlets?
    One of the cylinders is shared.


    Leave a comment:


  • TBone
    replied
    oag, da muss man in einem englischen forum einen landsmann treffen mit einem krassen auto ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Wizard-of-OD
    replied
    Originally posted by hammer
    Pics from my turbo (efr 9180) and my custom exhaust
    Cool project but can you run me through the thought process in using a twin scroll set up on an Inline-5 if you have no intentions of shutting off one of the inlets?

    Leave a comment:

Working...