modified kkk24 7000 turbo

[quattrostyle]

too bad

[andy10v]

They generic 3b chips? Not many 3b live mappers left

I understood Hoffer had a few 3b-rs2 and aby-rs2 generic chips, so I presume it is one of those.

MRC and Automark live map, anybody else in the uk?

[Jamo]

Chipswizard & Viper probably a few others. I no longer really follow though

[Ross]

I understood Hoffer had a few 3b-rs2 and aby-rs2 generic chips, so I presume it is one of those.

MRC and Automark live map, anybody else in the uk?

PRJ makes trips over here to map where there's a few cars to do.

I've had 400-450hp cars mapped by all of the above here in the UK.

[andy10v]

PRJ makes trips over here to map where there's a few cars to do.

I've had 400-450hp cars mapped by all of the above here in the UK.

Doesn't map 3b though.

[Ross]

Doesn't map 3b though.

Hmmm... being lazy I bet... in that case MRC is where I'd put my money... Mihnea complained like mad when I took a tuned 3B to him but it went very well with a GT3071R after he'd finished with it.

[Jamo]

MRC don't map 3B anymore AFAIK, it's not being lazy the 3B is harder to map than the ABY

[djh]

they did 220bhp's earlier in the year.

[Jamo]

Could have been because of that emulator issue then or did he have a generic map?

[djh]

Custom full map rs2 spec.

[Jamo]

That's an easy map

[andy10v]

So is the 3b software more awkward to work with? Or is it a hardware issue?

[prj]

Once again...
The software is exactly the same like in AAN/ABY, just a bit older so some advanced features are not available.

Mapping it is almost exactly the same, algorithms are mostly the same...
I just don't want to map it because I have to spend time and add fast datalogging, launch control etc to the 3B ecu, when there are very few 3B ecu's that need mapping.

It is really a question of putting in the time and testing, rather than whether it can be done or not...

Regardless of what anyone says - it is in no way more complicated to map 3B than ABY/AAN.

[andy10v]

Once again...
The software is exactly the same like in AAN/ABY, just a bit older so some advanced features are not available.

Mapping it is almost exactly the same, algorithms are mostly the same...
I just don't want to map it because I have to spend time and add fast datalogging, launch control etc to the 3B ecu, when there are very few 3B ecu's that need mapping.

It is really a question of putting in the time and testing, rather than whether it can be done or not...

Regardless of what anyone says - it is in no way more complicated to map 3B than ABY/AAN.

Cool, I understand your point of view as you have explained before, no point spending hours of your life preparing the tools to map a couple of cars, if that.

I was just curious in relation to the other comments in the thread.

[quattrostyle]

yeah it's not that I can't understand it, but I'm almost forced to buy ABY/AAN stuff this way