Originally posted by prj
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stock ECU MAF replacement project
Collapse
X
-
Audi UrS4 Avant 2.5 20vt - twincharged - Project
Audi 80q B4 Sedan 2.2 20vt - Daily user
BMW 320d Touring e91 M-Sport - Daily user
BMW 740iA e38 - Project
-
One and a half years later it's finally done.
The first prototype. Need to flash the software onto it and see if it boots up, but so far all I/O has been good.Attached Files
Comment
-
Some more comments - it is the exact shape of the insides of a little box which it will be housed in.
The operational amplifier is located in a DIP socket and is user replaceable.
The amplifier is used mostly as input/output protection, so you can wire this up in every wrong way possible and the only thing that will die is the amp.
The amp can be easily removed with a small screwdriver and a replacement costs about 5€ shipped.
Comment
-
-
Just want to add how interesting reading this entire post has been (took me half an hour) and how grateful we should be to Prj and those working with him for doing such extensive R&D without intentions to make excessive profits from it. I'm interested in this kit over the next few months as have some erratic idling going on and a mixture adaptation code that won't go away so MAF is a possible culprit. Keep up the good work, we need you :-)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sir Buff View PostGreat! When can i order it? :-)
We are also going to try to prototype some 6-pin MAF plugs to make this plug and play, but no promises yet
When you can buy... expect early Q4 release I'd say.
Comment
-
MAF related question. Clearly the non RS2 screens restrict flow at higher RPMs, but do they also counteract turbulence across the MAF element (and thus 'smooth' the output signal) or create turbulence by way of being an obstruction? Basically are the screens there only to prevent damage to the element and the engine from foreign bodies which have somehow cleared the air filter or do they serve some other airflow smoothing purpose?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thecrispynoodle View PostMAF related question. Clearly the non RS2 screens restrict flow at higher RPMs, but do they also counteract turbulence across the MAF element (and thus 'smooth' the output signal) or create turbulence by way of being an obstruction? Basically are the screens there only to prevent damage to the element and the engine from foreign bodies which have somehow cleared the air filter or do they serve some other airflow smoothing purpose?
Out at about 350 hp.
Comment
-
Originally posted by driftin jo View PostThey don't restrict flow, the sensor tops
Out at about 350 hp.
http://autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=0652
Check the entire series of negative boost articles. Very interesting info about the almost non existent pressure drop over the filter, etc.Last edited by EspenW; 9 August 2012, 23:51.1995 RS2 on Alcohol (6.8sec 100-200km/h)
1994 80E Avant
1986 2L Golf 2 on Alcohol
Comment
-
This report claims the screens do restrict flow. It's a good read. This is linked to inlet hose collapse on turbo upgrades also.http://autospeed.com/cms/title_Elimi...9/article.html
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thecrispynoodle View PostMAF related question. Clearly the non RS2 screens restrict flow at higher RPMs, but do they also counteract turbulence across the MAF element (and thus 'smooth' the output signal) or create turbulence by way of being an obstruction? Basically are the screens there only to prevent damage to the element and the engine from foreign bodies which have somehow cleared the air filter or do they serve some other airflow smoothing purpose?
I have debunked that autospeed article time and time again.
The pressure drop they measure is 29.6 INCHES OF WATER at 7000 rpm with screens attached and 24.8 with them removed.
That's a difference of 4.8 inches of water or in other words 0.012 bar.
Yes, that's 0.01 bar difference between the screens on and off. Their change in power figures is just because the MAF read completely wrong and probably the ECU over advanced the timing.
So please, no more talk about these screens and this 0.01 uber difference in this thread.
There is no practical difference whatsoever between these MAF's. Hell, there is less than 0.1 bar pressure drop (0.07 bar) through the entire intake of these cars at 7000 RPM.
I'd say Audi has done a very good job designing the intake system.
Comment
-
Soon... I did not have much time for it, but I am getting some help with it.
If all goes well, then they will be available in a few months.
Comment
Comment