DIY Coilovers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Error404
    Super Moderator
    • Mar 2007
    • 19789
    • Country: United Kingdom

    #91
    I got some KW V1s in the end, 60n front springs, 70n rear springs
    The compromise between ride and handling really is excellent.
    Panthero Coupé quattro 20vt
    Indigo ABY coupé
    Imola B6 S4 Avant

    Comment

    • jade
      S2Forum Extremist
      • Jan 2005
      • 1811
      • Home: New Zealand Current: Spain

      #92
      Originally posted by Error404
      I got some KW V1s in the end, 60n front springs, 70n rear springs
      The compromise between ride and handling really is excellent.
      What different do you find with the v1 compaired to the coilovers you made, you were obviously not happy if you changed ?

      Thanks
      RS 2 580HP

      Comment

      • Error404
        Super Moderator
        • Mar 2007
        • 19789
        • Country: United Kingdom

        #93
        I sold them before I finished them because the cost of getting them done right was more than buying a set of KWs. Springs, collars, helpers, getting the Konis dyno'd to match the springs was way more than just buying some KWs, plus they are inox and have corrected steering arm height etc etc

        HTH
        Panthero Coupé quattro 20vt
        Indigo ABY coupé
        Imola B6 S4 Avant

        Comment

        • jade
          S2Forum Extremist
          • Jan 2005
          • 1811
          • Home: New Zealand Current: Spain

          #94
          Ok thanks
          RS 2 580HP

          Comment

          • jade
            S2Forum Extremist
            • Jan 2005
            • 1811
            • Home: New Zealand Current: Spain

            #95
            Originally posted by Error404
            I got some KW V1s in the end, 60n front springs, 70n rear springs
            The compromise between ride and handling really is excellent.

            Just trying to work out good spring rates for fast road

            From what I have read front 350 and rear 400 lbs seem good

            May Be I am missing something but 60 nm is 530 lbs and 70 is 619 lbs?


            Thanks
            RS 2 580HP

            Comment

            • newsh
              S2Forum Obsessed
              • Aug 2003
              • 16226
              • Country: United Kingdom

              #96
              I don't understand why the rear springs should be stiffer than the front when there's more weight on the front

              S2 Coupe 3B Project


              Ur quattro restoration

              S2 Avant

              Boost is the new rock and roll!
              sigpic

              Comment

              • andy10v
                S2Forum Zealot
                • Mar 2009
                • 5996
                • Country: Scotland

                #97
                Originally posted by newsh
                I don't understand why the rear springs should be stiffer than the front when there's more weight on the front
                To encourage the rear to loose traction first?
                Current-2004 Impreza PPP wagon

                Sold-92 3B coupe-RS2+, 996s, konis, rear torsen, forged rods........
                Sold ABY-stock

                Comment

                • speeding-g60
                  S2Forum Extremist
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 1186
                  • Country: United States

                  #98
                  not sure for you guys. but here is my theory for drag racing.

                  and it seems to be working for me anyways.

                  i run 900lb/inch springs in the back to prevent squatting on launch.
                  and i run 650lb/inch in the front, as i do not want too much lift on the same launch.

                  i want to keep all four tires planted firmly.

                  my car (without me) weighs ~1600lb front and ~1000lb rear.... and i still squat the **** end and lift the front some. but on the top end at 150+ MPH, it sure is looking kind of funny!

                  my car tries to lift the front end off the ground still when i launch, but since i have made a best of 1.400 60' time, i dont really think i will spend any time on the suspension yet.

                  here are a couple pics to show what i mean.







                  Comment

                  • Error404
                    Super Moderator
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 19789
                    • Country: United Kingdom

                    #99
                    Originally posted by newsh
                    I don't understand why the rear springs should be stiffer than the front when there's more weight on the front
                    OK! I won't profess to understanding the maths behind it but there is an equation to work out how the various suspension parameters affect weight transfer. As far as my small brain understands it, the theory goes something like this:


                    When you corner in the car, you get weight transfer from the inside to the outside tyres. Generally, the more weight transfer the less grip because the outside tyres get overloaded until they loose grip. Weight transfer is controlled with the cars roll stiffness but it is not affected by the total roll stiffness but the relative stiffness of the front and rear axles. The roll stiffness is made up from the ARB and the springs.

                    All other parameters being equal, increasing the front and rear axle roll stiffness by the same amount doesn't affect weight transfer - the total weight transfer remains constant so whilst the body roll is reduced and it feels nicer there is no actual performance change.
                    It is the relationship between front and rear roll stiffnesses that affects weight transfer. Centre of Gravity is the important factor where weight is concerned, not specific axle weight. It is the track width and centre of gravity that affect the total weight transfer. for example if you could get your CoG to be at ground level you would have zero weight transfer. The amount of body roll is affect by the distance between the roll centre axis and the CoG.

                    So you would think that more axle roll stiffness would decrease lateral weight transfer but actually it increases it. So for in this instance if you just stiffen the rear axle you increase the weight transfer on that axle, but because the total weight transfer remains constant the net result is reducing the front weight transfer also. So the grip balance shifts forwards and understeer is reduced.

                    More simply as Aaron has shown above stiffer rear springs also help with traction under acceleration as the front wheels can get more traction with less squat from rear weight transfer - as you want to go WOT as early as possible when exiting the corner less squat helps you with tractive grip.




                    EDIT: Downsides are more dive under braking and if you take it too far obviously you will get more oversteer.

                    Last edited by Error404; 15 September 2012, 11:28.
                    Panthero Coupé quattro 20vt
                    Indigo ABY coupé
                    Imola B6 S4 Avant

                    Comment

                    • Rusty
                      Super Moderator
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 18953
                      • Country: United Kingdom

                      #100
                      Originally posted by jade
                      Just trying to work out good spring rates for fast road

                      From what I have read front 350 and rear 400 lbs seem good

                      May Be I am missing something but 60 nm is 530 lbs and 70 is 619 lbs?


                      Thanks
                      No, conversion is 1 N/mm = 5.7 lb/in so 60 N/mm. ~ 340 lb/in.

                      Alex, weight transfer is caused by the torque reaction to acceleration the mass of the car where the centre of mass is above the ground, if that helps at all.

                      Newsh, springs are a funny one and depend primarily on suspension design (read leverage). Not able to answer your specific question but I'm sure the answer will be in a book somewhere.
                      Cheers'en, AndyC
                      1994 ABY Coupe - Projekt Alpinweiss

                      Comment

                      • terrybullwon
                        S2Forum Zealot
                        • Mar 2006
                        • 8782
                        • Country: England

                        #101
                        I dunno if I added this but I took 120nm front and rear as was recommended when corner weighting the car
                        Chef

                        Comment

                        • terrybullwon
                          S2Forum Zealot
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 8782
                          • Country: England

                          #102
                          But again my set up is alittle different
                          Chef

                          Comment

                          • Error404
                            Super Moderator
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 19789
                            • Country: United Kingdom

                            #103
                            your CoG will be much further back than our road cars
                            Panthero Coupé quattro 20vt
                            Indigo ABY coupé
                            Imola B6 S4 Avant

                            Comment

                            • Error404
                              Super Moderator
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 19789
                              • Country: United Kingdom

                              #104
                              This is the equation derived by Bill Milliken to calculated weight shift:



                              ΔWf = Front weight transfer
                              ΔWr = Rear weight transfer
                              Ay = lateral acceleration
                              W= total vehicle weight
                              tf= front track
                              tr= rear track
                              H= height of CoG above roll axis
                              Kf = front roll stiffness
                              Kr= rear roll stiffness
                              a= longitudinal distance from front axle to CoG
                              b= longitudinal distance from rear axle to CoG
                              l= wheelbase
                              Zrf= front roll center height
                              Zrr= rear roll center height
                              Panthero Coupé quattro 20vt
                              Indigo ABY coupé
                              Imola B6 S4 Avant

                              Comment

                              • jade
                                S2Forum Extremist
                                • Jan 2005
                                • 1811
                                • Home: New Zealand Current: Spain

                                #105
                                [QUOTE=Rusty;670290]No, conversion is 1 N/mm = 5.7 lb/in so 60 N/mm. ~ 340 lb/in.

                                yes, that looks better ! Do you have any recommendations for spring height ? 7" or 8"

                                Thanks
                                RS 2 580HP

                                Comment

                                Working...