Thanks S2 people, Nice 944, i think the interior is a bit loud for me though!
dangeropus in the wet? only if you havent been in a RWD before, i have owned 100s of quick cars, and comparing to most RWD cars its the safest.
I have had it out of shape at over 100mph many times, not even a worry- there is no snatchback like an M3 or 911. It does what you tell it.
I am deep in my S2 build now and i think this will just be put back as it was and used this summer, the conversion can wait.
There are i5 20v conversions, only 3 i know of but a lot of work and cost tbh, and why bother as the 944 engine will do the same power at the early tuning stages as the i5 - 280-290 on a chip, 330 with a K26/8 and WG, 420 available with bolt on's some cars with 600hp. the 944 engine is lighter and sits behind the front wheels - i think fitting the i5 is going backwards in handling terms. *maybe worth it for sound.
The 968 cs (same chassis as this) is rated as one of the best handleing production cars of all time.
dangeropus in the wet? only if you havent been in a RWD before, i have owned 100s of quick cars, and comparing to most RWD cars its the safest.
I have had it out of shape at over 100mph many times, not even a worry- there is no snatchback like an M3 or 911. It does what you tell it.
I am deep in my S2 build now and i think this will just be put back as it was and used this summer, the conversion can wait.
There are i5 20v conversions, only 3 i know of but a lot of work and cost tbh, and why bother as the 944 engine will do the same power at the early tuning stages as the i5 - 280-290 on a chip, 330 with a K26/8 and WG, 420 available with bolt on's some cars with 600hp. the 944 engine is lighter and sits behind the front wheels - i think fitting the i5 is going backwards in handling terms. *maybe worth it for sound.
The 968 cs (same chassis as this) is rated as one of the best handleing production cars of all time.

















Comment