Just been playing with my cone filter setup and using my old MAF. I bought a secondhand MAF a few years ago and for one reason or another, I've been using it for a while now. Interestingly enough, my old MAF made the car feel quite flat and it had nowhere near the zing that it had with the one I just removed! I remember this being the reverse when I fitted my secondhand MAF, I think this is why I kept it, the car drove better on it!
Hardly suprising I guess, there are design tolerances for all these things and I should really have reset the ECU.
My question is, what does the ECU look for when deciding what fuelling to give on a WOT MAF signal/voltage (as there's no lambada feedback) and does it alter for different MAFs while driving at part load, such that over time, any differences will be ironed out as it normalises the signal at part load and interpolates to WOT...
OR
Does the ECU take the MAF at WOT as gospel and thus it fuels to the new MAF's characteristics and doesn't evert change this?
Hardly suprising I guess, there are design tolerances for all these things and I should really have reset the ECU.
My question is, what does the ECU look for when deciding what fuelling to give on a WOT MAF signal/voltage (as there's no lambada feedback) and does it alter for different MAFs while driving at part load, such that over time, any differences will be ironed out as it normalises the signal at part load and interpolates to WOT...
OR
Does the ECU take the MAF at WOT as gospel and thus it fuels to the new MAF's characteristics and doesn't evert change this?
Comment