You can change the style the forum displays by selecting your preferred style at the bottom left of the site.
We have made an enhancement so that old threads should now link from search results to the correct thread. This is not yet in place for single post links
my timing is about the same as Vas has. he has more in some areas than me but i think thats turbo dependent too. i got a few degrees here and there in the kit bag still i think.
i can tell this by the changes in cell to the egt.
illpost a map soon. probly not to many's taste my setup but there goes. also its 1.1.23rc. im yet to upgrade.
i have high timing on cruise and recently uped it a bit till 140kpa. Still working on how the car behaves in cruise. However as megatune does only have a generic IAT to timing curve reduction, it may be that you are knocking because it is not retarded enough for those temps.
having said that my motronic kept that timing up to 44C IATs which i somehow dont believe as i have seen some old vagcom logs
i have high timing on cruise and recently uped it a bit till 140kpa. Still working on how the car behaves in cruise. However as megatune does only have a generic IAT to timing curve reduction, it may be that you are knocking because it is not retarded enough for those temps.
having said that my motronic kept that timing up to 44C IATs which i somehow dont believe as i have seen some old vagcom logs
He's on 1.1.64 I think so it's vemstune with the retard table.
30-40c is high, I need to get the 1.8t MAT in mine to double check but 1.7 bar and 17c temp, tribute to Wagner IC!
right, I was curious to see if he meant because of dome design or something of the sort. I understand how higher CR is more prone to knock. I have had some thoughts on this. I'm not an advocate of running lower CR unless its absolutely necessary to avoid knock. On race gas, meth, or E85 this is especially true. Thats for another thread however.
BTW Jamo, I decreased req fuel by about .57 and increased VE map by the same factor. The car runs exactly the same but seems to be more responsive to small adjustments to the VE map. I also increased the MAP samples to 10 as you suggested. I was able to turn the boost up to roughly 17psi (or 216 kPa) and did some more fuel tuning to get it closer to .85 lambda. Its still rough, but better than before. I'll post the map as soon as I get a chance to grab it out of the ECU. Still needs about 5 degrees all over the timing map and probably more in some places. I'll be sure to keep this updated with new and improved maps.
he is referring to the IATs that the reverse manifold can help keep low
Thats what i dont see. The surface of the intake path is very low in order to exchange enough heat and raise the IAT because tha air mass is very high.
Thats what i dont see. The surface of the intake path is very low in order to exchange enough heat and raise the IAT because tha air mass is very high.
Datalog the the temps of a reverse car and then compare it to the same spec car without the reverse and you will see a big difference in temp.
The intake pipe heatsoaks badly on the stock setup, the plastic pipe isn't as bad on the RS2 for this even then.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment